Editor's Note: Myles Kitagawa's personal blog can be found at mylesk.livejournal.com
According to a recent Pew Charitable Trust survey, 59% of people do not believe that 97% of scientists agree that anthropogenic climate change is real. Their perception is that the ratio of scientists who confirm climate change to those who deny it is in the range of 50-50.
At a recent conference convened by the Alberta Ecotrust, speaker Dr. Justina Ray explained this grotesque outcome in her session on The Science Policy Gap. Media stories, Dr. Ray said, depend on conflict, and near-consensus situations contain very little of it. Consequently, if a reporter is going to write a conflict-based story about the science of climate change, he or she must escalate the validity of the 3% of deniers so that a story with an air of controversy might be produced. It follows that a public who relies on this distortion would conclude that the climate change is controversial when this is actually not the case.
Among the people who populate my life, there are a few correspondents who believe that climate change is a hoax - that it is a religion-like tenet held by people who have “drunk the ad hominem kool-aid” handed out by charismatic leaders like Al Gore and David Suzuki. Ad Hominem Kool-Aid is the beverage preferred by people who choose their beliefs based on who says what rather than a careful examination of what they are saying.
In contrast to these members of homo ad hominus, there are the Children of the Enlightenment who are described in the Ted Nordhaus/Michael Shellenberger essay, The Death of Environmentalism this way: read more... »



Recent comments
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 5 days ago